The Columbia Valley, Washington’s largest winegrowing region, is blessed with the ability to consistently produce exceptional fruit. That fruit should always be front and center of the state’s wines. At present, the oak steals the show with too many Washington wines.
Growers spend all of their time in the vineyard trying to grow the best fruit that they possibly can. Then many winemakers slather it with a flavor typically purchased from halfway around the world that masks that fruit. It makes no sense to me.
To be fair, new oak is delicious. It adds texture, flavor, tannins, and aromatics. But again, it is a purchased flavor that is, in the case of Washington, exogenous to where it is grown. To me, oak is like salt when cooking: You want just enough but never too much.
I see two problems with oak usage in Washington, speaking, of course, very broadly. First, a lot of wines have too much new oak. It obscures the fruit and therefore the sense of place (and sometimes, frankly, even the variety). Second, a lot of producers are not using the right type of oak. That is to say, the oak is not properly matched to the fruit. That makes the oak seem heavy-handed at best and clumsy at worst.
In recent years, I’ve had wines from a number of producers that have scaled back on new oak due to financial conditions, pandemic related shipping issues, or something else. In most cases, the wines have been considerably better for it. Similarly, wines that use new oak judiciously often stand out in my tastings.
A separate but related issue is winemakers failing to adjust their oak regimen to the vintage. The 2022 vintage red wines from the Columbia Valley provide an excellent example. It was a cool vintage with a heavy crop. Subsequently, there was, in many cases, less ripeness and intensity in the wines than in a hot vintage, like 2021.
Yet many winemakers clearly used the same oak protocol as always. Some of the 2022 vintage wines taste positively bludgeoned with oak, as they don’t have the fruit intensity to match. To be clear, there’s plenty of fruit there; there’s just too much oak. In this regard, I’m reminded of many wines from the 2011 vintage, which were heavy on oak and light on fruit, with the latter due to the coolness of the year.
Why does this happen? Again, new oak is delicious. Ripe, high-percentage new oak wines often taste good – and also often score well with many reviewers. I also think that winemakers can get a house palate, where they don’t necessarily taste the oak because they are so used to working with it.
In terms of oak not being properly matched to the fruit, I believe the problem lies elsewhere. Historically, Washington has relied heavily on tribal knowledge. One person uses certain types of oak barrels, trains people, and those people subsequently use the same types of barrels.
This is, of course, natural, but so is evolution. To improve the overall quality of the wines – and equally importantly to not mask the sense of place – Washington winemakers should focus on more judicious use of oak and better selection of oak. There should be far more intention than there is right now.
The best producers in Washington, and there are a considerable number of them, are both judicious with new oak and use oak that is exceptionally well-matched to their fruit. To wit, I’ve had wines that are 100% new oak where one would never know.
However, in too many wines the oak plays a primary role. It’s time to let the fruit and the place shine.
If you haven’t already subscribed to Northwest Wine Report, now is the time! This site is 100% subscriber funded and is my primary source of income. None of the content can be created without your subscription. Subscribe here. It’s the cost per month of a cup of coffee and a crumpet. To those who have subscribed, thank you! You power this site.
To receive articles via email, click here.
Interesting points. Assume Cabernet is the focus here. Feel like Washington Rhône’s are generally not heavily oaked.
Have noticed that there is a different spread of coopers up north than typically found in California cellars. TN, the Francois freres owned cooperages(demptos, radoux, fouquet, darnajou) and Kendall Jackson aligned cooperages 1912 all commonly found. Perhaps the key is using better wood. Will be hard to shake what you refer to as tribal thinking.
SM, I would say more Bordeaux variety-focused than strictly Cabernet Sauvignon, although that is Washington’s most produced variety. Things have definitely gotten much, much better with Rhône varieties over the last 25 years, although I still see examples there too sometimes.
It might be better wood in some cases, but I believe it is just better matching the wood to the fruit. An example I often give is white Burgundy. People will sometimes say to me, “I don’t like Chardonnay, but I like white Burgundy because they use less oak.” If you look at those wines, many of them use plentiful amounts of new oak. However, the oak is exceptionally well-matched to their fruit.
To me, when oak is well-matched, it plays a supportive and enhancing role. When it’s not, it sticks out, overrides the fruit, or potentially even steals the show. As I said in the article, Washington is blessed with such exceptionally high quality fruit. In my opinion, it deserves to be at the fore.
I agree with your assessment and personally witnessed too many times with both Washington and California premium (aka: expensive varietal wines). I don’t like tasting pencil shavings and/or overly toasted barrels in my wine. In many situations, aging wines in (3-4 year old) barrels is the way to go with (maybe) <10% new barrels.
I couldn’t agree with you more, Sean.
Absolutely concur. Thanks for shining a light on this. House palate is spot on.